Although not fully adopted by some, and used significantly less than overview, whole actually not wrong. (If you are here to ask us to affirm your claim againstwhole bias, we’re sorry.) It’s even close in age to its sister word, appearing as a variant shortly after overview has become standard in the English language.
‘Totalism’: the tendency in nature to form wholes that are greater than the sum of parts
overview coined by South African soldier and statesman Jan Christian Smuts in the 1920s as a philosophical term. Smuts, who—aside from war and politics—was a student of the natural sciences, used the term to describe his complex philosophy of nature’s organization. Viewing the universe as a “whole” – that is, organisms and systems rather than molecules and atoms – he drew holisticism from Greek holo, which means “whole.” In his 1926 book Holism and evolutionhe defines holisticism EQUAL “[the] tendency in nature to form wholes greater than the sum of parts through creative evolution.”
Smuts’ philosophy was quickly applied to other areas, such as medicine, where it influenced the development of methods of treating the patient as a “whole person”, rather than focusing too narrow to single symptoms. In short, a “w” was attached to holisticism And overviewprobably a result of the similarity between the root hol- and from fullare basically the same.
Equally important is the relative obscurity of the original Greek word, which appears only in a few familiar words besides holisticismsuch as massacre And holograms. (And even in those words, the hint of its “wholeness” is not clear.) In this light, the formation of whole seems to be a natural, if not inevitable, step in the development of overview.
Argue whole somehow a corruption of overview doesn’t really match the other word history. take the word full eg itself. It was developed from Middle English hoolbut added w does not affect its meaning. The history of the English language is rife with such changes, and once they have been established, they – forgive us – become part of the whole.
Today, overview And whole are sometimes used interchangeably. overview, however, is much more common in academic and medical writing. Having full basis, whole often used by writers who want to emphasize something in its entirety:
See a financial planner to get a comprehensive assessment of your finances and clarify your priorities and goals. — Liz Frazier Peck, Forbes.comJuly 19, 2017
Non-profit organization goals [Al] This is a “holistic” approach, says Barsema. “We spell it (with a ‘w’) because we consider the whole person” and their needs, be it addiction recovery, mental illness treatment, transportation, he says. back, housing, or a combination thereof. — Sunday Telegraph (Massachusetts), March 26, 2017
She approaches animals and production from a holistic perspective, not just as a means to cut costs. “I feel like my cooking is very Old World,” says Williams, recalling her ancestors’ need to use whole animals to survive with limited means. — Michigan Daily (University of Michigan), February 13, 2017
variant holism, on the other hand, is very rare. Its failure to use may be due to the technical nature of the -tenet word, usually referring to an established theory, doctrine, or medical condition. When variation is encountered, it is usually in a scientific context.
We are the first generation that has consciously experienced the global oil crisis, a global pollution problem. We went through Chernobyl, an impressive lesson in global unity. Scientific ‘holism’ has been taken to the furthest point by David Bohm, Professor of Theoretical Physics at Birkbeck College, London. In Wholeness And The Implicate Order (Ark, £2.95) he postulates… — Walter Schwarz, guard (London), October 28, 1986
Although these “w” variants are etymologically deceptive, they tend to be useful in conveying the meaning of “wholeness”. And for writers who like to play with words, they can be a fun alternative to formal writing. overview And holisticism.
Categories: Usage Notes
Source: vothisaucamau.edu.vn
